Comments on: Battle of Interpreters: MRI vs JRuby vs Rubinius http://www.blackbytes.info/2016/10/mri-vs-jruby-vs-rubinius/ Ruby Programming Tutorials Sat, 07 Jan 2017 19:44:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.3 By: Jesus Castello http://www.blackbytes.info/2016/10/mri-vs-jruby-vs-rubinius/#comment-540 Fri, 07 Oct 2016 13:37:59 +0000 http://www.blackbytes.info/?p=3547#comment-540 The numbers on the post are for “3.6” (I did ruby-install rbx 3.6). Sorry, I thought 3.60 & 3.6 were the same thing 🙂

]]>
By: Charles Nutter http://www.blackbytes.info/2016/10/mri-vs-jruby-vs-rubinius/#comment-539 Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:01:40 +0000 http://www.blackbytes.info/?p=3547#comment-539 Maybe you can just confirm those numbers are actually 3.60. I thought I saw “3.6” in the post before.

]]>
By: Jesus Castello http://www.blackbytes.info/2016/10/mri-vs-jruby-vs-rubinius/#comment-538 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:00:27 +0000 http://www.blackbytes.info/?p=3547#comment-538 Not sure what’s going on there. Is there anything I can do to find out?

Here is some additional info in case it helps:

llvm-config –version: 3.5.2
clang version: 3.8.1

]]>
By: Charles Oliver Nutter http://www.blackbytes.info/2016/10/mri-vs-jruby-vs-rubinius/#comment-537 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 01:14:04 +0000 http://www.blackbytes.info/?p=3547#comment-537 I just noticed your numbers for Rubinius 3.60 are way off too. Why is that? MRI was almost more than 1.5x faster for me.

]]>
By: Charles Oliver Nutter http://www.blackbytes.info/2016/10/mri-vs-jruby-vs-rubinius/#comment-536 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:25:41 +0000 http://www.blackbytes.info/?p=3547#comment-536 Ahhh that could explain it. Depending on how the virtualization is done, the JVM can have degraded performance. Thanks!

]]>